Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Guides Stories

How Do You Find a Planet?

RC
By Rob Crotzer
Updated August 26, 2026 · 7 min read

How Clyde Tombaugh found Pluto in 1930 — two glass plates, a blinking machine, and a search built on a mistake.

The Milky Way over Death Valley’s Racetrack Playa — the kind of dense starfield Clyde Tombaugh had to search one photographic plate at a time
Photo: Dan Duriscoe / NPS · Public domain (U.S. government work)

At four in the afternoon on February 18, 1930, a twenty-four-year-old with no college degree leaned into an eyepiece in Flagstaff, Arizona, and watched a single speck of light hop back and forth.

He had been at it since early that morning. He had been at it, in one form or another, for the better part of a year. Everything else in the frame, several hundred thousand stars, sat perfectly still.

Within forty-five minutes he walked down the hall to the director’s office and said: “I have found your Planet X.”

This is the part of the Pluto story that usually gets compressed into one sentence. It deserves better, because the how is the interesting bit, and because the method Clyde Tombaugh used is one you could explain to a ten-year-old in about a minute.

The job application was a set of drawings

Tombaugh grew up on farms in Illinois and then Kansas, and he wanted a telescope he could not possibly afford. So he built one.

Not metaphorically. Lowell Observatory’s own account of it lists the parts: a grain auger, the base of a cream separator, a fly wheel, and the axle out of an early-model Buick. He finished that 9-inch reflector early in 1928. He ground the mirror himself.

Clyde Tombaugh around 1930, standing beside the 9-inch Newtonian reflector he built himself on his family’s Kansas farm, its tube hand-lettered with the aperture and focal length
The telescope he built out of farm parts. The tube is hand-lettered: 9 INCH NEWTONIAN TELESCOPE, 79 INCH FOCUS · Wikimedia Commons

Then he did the thing that actually changed his life, and it is the least technical step in this whole story. He pointed the telescope at Mars and Jupiter, made careful drawings of what he saw, and mailed them to professional astronomers at Lowell Observatory — a place he had never been, run by people he did not know.

The director, V.M. Slipher, looked at the drawings of a stranger from Kansas and offered him a job. Tombaugh arrived in January 1929. He stayed fourteen years.

A telescope built to do one thing

The job was not glamorous. Percival Lowell had died in 1916 convinced that an undiscovered ninth planet, which he called Planet X, was tugging at the orbit of Uranus. The observatory that carried his name had been looking for it, on and off, ever since.

What they needed was a camera that could photograph enormous swaths of sky at once. So between 1928 and 1929 they built one specifically for the search: the 13-inch Lawrence Lowell Astrograph. It was a telescope designed never to be looked through. It recorded onto glass photographic plates measuring fourteen by seventeen inches.

Lowell Observatory’s 13-inch f/5.3 astrograph in its dome in Flagstaff, Arizona, the red tube angled down with a 14x17-inch glass plate holder latched to its back
The 13-inch astrograph, built for the Planet X search. The metal box latched to the back is the plate holder · Pretzelpaws / Wikimedia Commons

Tombaugh’s job was to expose those plates, night after night, in the cold, and then, the hard part, to find one moving object hiding somewhere inside them.

The machine that did the looking

Here is the idea the whole discovery rests on, and it is beautifully simple:

You are not looking for a planet. You are looking for the one dot that moved.

Photograph the same patch of sky twice, several nights apart. Every star will be exactly where it was — stars are so far away that they do not visibly shift in a week. Anything orbiting the Sun will have crawled a little. Find the thing that crawled and you have found a world.

The trick is doing that comparison across plates carrying tens of thousands of star images each, and closer to a million in the richest fields near the Milky Way. Your eye cannot hold that.

So Lowell had a Carl Zeiss blink comparator. It clamped two plates side by side under a microscope and flicked the view between them about three times a second. Anything unchanged sat dead still. Anything that had moved appeared to jump back and forth, over and over, refusing to be ignored.

The Carl Zeiss Jena blink comparator on display at Lowell Observatory, its two glass-plate holders side by side — the machine Clyde Tombaugh used to flip between two photographic plates until one faint point of light jumped
The Zeiss blink comparator, now on display at Lowell. Two plates, one microscope, three flicks a second · Pretzelpaws / Wikimedia Commons

It is a machine that converts a problem your brain is terrible at, spotting the difference between two nearly identical starfields, into one your brain is superb at: notice the thing that is flickering.

It is also monotonous beyond description. Tombaugh sat at it for hours a day, field after field, for months.

Four o’clock, February 18, 1930

The plates on the machine that afternoon showed a field near Delta Geminorum, exposed on January 23 and January 29, six nights apart.

A point of light blinked. Tombaugh found a second blinking point a few millimeters to the left: the same object, on the other plate, in the place it had moved to.

He did not go running down the hall. He went and got a third plate, from January 21, and checked. He measured the shift: about three millimeters across six days. That is a crucial number, because how far a thing moves tells you how far away it is. Something that sluggish had to be out past Neptune. And it was drifting east to west: retrograde, the direction an outer-Solar-System object shows when Earth overtakes it.

Only then did he go and tell Slipher.

The two photographic plates on which Clyde Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930, taken six days apart at Lowell Observatory; white arrows mark the faint point of light that shifts against the fixed background stars
The evidence itself: January 23 and January 29, 1930. The arrows mark Pluto · Clyde Tombaugh / Lowell Observatory

Look at the arrows. That is the entire discovery — a smudge that is a fraction brighter than nothing, a few millimeters from where it sat six nights before. Everything we know about Pluto, every photograph New Horizons sent home eighty-five years later, unspools from those two dots.

The announcement waited until March 13, 1930, and the date was chosen rather than stumbled into: it was Percival Lowell’s birthday, and the 149th anniversary of William Herschel’s discovery of Uranus.

The name arrived from an eleven-year-old. Venetia Burney was at breakfast in Oxford the next morning when her grandfather, a former head of the Bodleian Library, read out the news of a new planet. She knew her mythology and suggested Pluto, god of the underworld, for a world in permanent dark. It also opens with P L — Percival Lowell’s initials. The observatory loved it.

The prediction was wrong. The planet was there anyway.

Now the part that gets left out of the triumphant version, and the part I find hardest to look away from.

Lowell’s Planet X was supposed to be a massive world whose gravity was disturbing the orbit of Uranus. Pluto is nothing of the kind. It is a small icy body about two-thirds the width of our Moon, and it could not perturb Uranus if it tried.

So why did the math seem to point at roughly the right patch of sky? It didn’t. The wobble Lowell was chasing was never there. It was an artifact of a slightly wrong figure for the mass of Neptune, and when Voyager 2 flew past Neptune in 1989 and the mass was revised down by about half a percent, the discrepancies in Uranus’s orbit dissolved. There was nothing left to explain.

Which means Lowell spent a fortune and the last decade of his life hunting a planet that did not exist, in a region where a real one happened to be sitting. The search was built on an error. It found something anyway, because the search itself was sound: photograph everything, compare everything, look at every dot.

That is a better lesson than the tidy version. Good method survives a bad premise.

Thirteen more years at the machine

Tombaugh did not stop. He kept exposing plates and blinking them for another thirteen years, working through millions more star images, looking for a tenth planet.

He never found one. There wasn’t one to find, and the sweep was thorough enough that it stood as strong evidence of that fact, which is its own kind of result. Along the way he turned up asteroids, variable stars and clusters of galaxies. He went back and collected the degrees he had never been able to afford, and taught for decades at New Mexico State.

He died in 1997, nine years before the vote that reclassified his planet as a dwarf.

In January 2006, NASA launched New Horizons toward Pluto with about an ounce of his ashes bolted to the inside of the upper deck, in a canister roughly two inches across. On July 14, 2015, it swept past the world he had found on two glass plates, and sent back the pictures.

He made the trip.

You already know how to do this

Pluto itself is not a backyard target. At around magnitude 14 it is a faint star-like point in a large telescope and nothing at all in a small one. If you want to see what a first telescope actually delivers, our guide to what you can see is the realistic answer, and the beginner scopes worth buying is where to start.

But the method is not locked away in 1930. Blinking two images to find what changed is still exactly how amateurs discover variable stars, catch asteroids, and hunt supernovae. It is also, stripped down, what the smart telescope on your lawn is doing when it takes frame after frame of the same field and compares them.

Tombaugh had a farm-built reflector, a plate camera, and a machine that flickered three times a second. What he really had was patience and a system. The gear you can buy today for the price of a used bicycle is better than his.

And if you want the other half of this story — what happened to Pluto in 2006, and why a children’s book quietly rewrote its own rhyme — that one is told at our house every night at bedtime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who discovered Pluto?

Clyde Tombaugh, a 24-year-old assistant at Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona, on February 18, 1930. He had no college degree at the time. Lowell Observatory hired him in January 1929 on the strength of drawings of Mars and Jupiter he had made with a 9-inch reflecting telescope he built himself from farm and car parts, including a grain auger, a cream separator base and the axle of an early-model Buick.

How was Pluto discovered?

By photographing the same patch of sky on different nights and comparing the plates. Tombaugh used Lowell Observatory's 13-inch Lawrence Lowell Astrograph, built specifically for the search, to expose 14x17-inch glass plates. He then loaded pairs of plates into a Zeiss blink comparator, which flicked between the two views about three times a second. Stars stayed motionless; anything orbiting the Sun appeared to jump. Pluto turned up on plates exposed on January 23 and January 29, 1930, having moved about three millimeters in six nights.

What is a blink comparator?

A microscope that holds two photographic plates of the same star field and rapidly alternates the view between them. Unchanged objects look perfectly still, while anything that has moved between the two exposures appears to blink back and forth. It converts an impossible task - spotting one difference between two near-identical fields of hundreds of thousands of stars - into an easy one, because human eyes are very good at noticing something that flickers. The instrument Tombaugh used is on display at Lowell Observatory.

How long did it take to find Pluto?

Tombaugh started work at Lowell Observatory in January 1929 and found Pluto on February 18, 1930 - a little over a year of exposing plates at night and blinking them by day. The wider search was far older: Percival Lowell began hunting his 'Planet X' in 1905 and died in 1916 without finding it.

Why is Pluto called Pluto?

The name was suggested by Venetia Burney, an 11-year-old in Oxford, England, who heard about the new planet at breakfast on March 14, 1930 from her grandfather, a former head of the Bodleian Library. She proposed Pluto, the Roman god of the underworld, as fitting for a world in permanent darkness. The name had a bonus the observatory liked: its first two letters are the initials of Percival Lowell.

Was Percival Lowell right about Planet X?

No, though the search he started found something real. Lowell predicted a massive planet whose gravity was disturbing the orbit of Uranus. Pluto is far too small to do that - it is roughly two-thirds the width of Earth's Moon. The orbital discrepancies Lowell was chasing turned out not to exist at all: they came from a slightly wrong value for the mass of Neptune, which was corrected after Voyager 2's 1989 flyby, at which point the anomaly disappeared. Pluto's presence near the predicted region was a coincidence.

Can you see Pluto with a telescope?

Not from a typical backyard. At about magnitude 14 and roughly 3.7 billion miles away, Pluto is out of reach for most amateur telescopes, and large ones show only a faint star-like point with no detail. The plates Tombaugh worked from recorded it as a smudge barely brighter than the background.

RC
By Rob Crotzer · Founder & Editor

Rob founded Outer Space Trip and writes its operator cost guides, the Space Tourism Price Index, and the See Space Now gear reviews. He tracks pricing and flight-status announcements from every major operator and tests the stargazing gear we recommend. How we pick and source ▸

KEEP READING
THE SPACE TOURISM BRIEFING

What Space Costs, Every Week

The Briefing is our free weekly email: what space costs now (we track every operator), what’s launching, and what to see in the sky tonight. Subscribe and your welcome email brings The Starter Sky Plan — seven nights from your first good look at the Moon to Saturn’s rings.

Free, every week. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.